ARLIS/NA 30th / VRA 20th Joint Conference , Hyatt Regency, Union Station, St. Louis, Missouri - March 20-26, 2002

Solo Librarians Discussion Group, Saturday, March 23, 2002   4:00 p.m.

Moderator:  Eumie Imm-Stroukoff

Recorder: Allison Colborne

After welcoming everyone, Eumie asked the group participants to introduce themselves.

She distributed the agenda for the meeting, noting that the agenda was derived from topics sent to her via ARLIS-L prior to the conference. At the same time, Eumie also distributed a list she compiled of members who expressed interest in participating in the discussion group.

Discussion then ensued on the topics according to the agenda: Staff Cutbacks, Outsourcing, Off-Site Storage, Automation, Fund-raising, Policy Setting and Time Management and Multi-tasking.

On the topic of Staff Cutbacks, strategies arose relating to increasing staffing, the pros and cons of using volunteers, and types of projects and duties to assign volunteers. One participant talked of how they outsourced work to a local nursing home and day programs at the hospital.  The attendees who use volunteers noted and agreed that it is important to keep track of the total number of hours contributed by volunteers, with the suggestion of using a log manual to track hours. It was also noted that it is important to prepare a job description for volunteers just like one would for a salaried position, that volunteers should be interviewed for positions, and that employers should have the same expectations of volunteers as they do for salaried employees.  Other comments arising from the discussion of volunteers in libraries were the high investment of time spent in training for value of work performed, perception by administrator’s and others that “anyone can work in a library,” and the amount of time needed to be spent to prepare procedures for volunteers to follow. 

The discussion of time for value then shifted to student workers and student interns. Discussion in relation to student workers revolved around the change over of staff per semester, what kinds of projects could be assigned and how to manage the student and projects assigned. Paul Glassman told of an eight-week project working on the artists’ files at the Library of the New York School of Interior Design. Paul suggested having a work plan based on the semester time frame and having a contract with the student performing the project.

The next topic to be discussed was Outsourcing.    Paul Glassman addressed this issue outlining how it works for the New York School of Interior Design. He told the group that NYU does the cataloging for the New York School of Interior Design and the students at his institution have reciprocal access and borrowing privileges.   Paul outlined the fee per title charged for the cataloging and for the reciprocal access and borrowing privileges.  Outsourcing companies such as Marchive (San Antonio, Texas) were then discussed noting the fee structure charged for cataloging per title for original and copy cataloging.

The discussion then moved on to Off-Site Storage and Automation. The group discussed consortial arrangements for automation and contrasted it with the purchase of small online systems.     The George Eastman House spoke of their arrangement with the University of Rochester. Small systems mentioned during the discussion were: CASPR, Follett, Alexander, and In Magic.

Fund-raising was the next topic of discussion.  The conversation generated discussion on utilizing Friends groups, different approaches to soliciting funds, the importance of having a list of wants and working with the development office at your institution.   

The discussion then briefly covered Policy Setting, the development of policies, mission statements, sources for the same and the plan to share policies through the Museum Libraries Group.

The final topic discussed during the discussion group was Time Management and Multi-tasking. Suggestions made were to set target dates for goals and to track workers using Excel or another spreadsheet program.

The Solo Librarian’s Discussion Group was so lively that it ran overtime. Eumie thanked everyone for coming.