Annual Report (2003)
ARLIS/NA Gerd Muehsam Award Committee


Submitted: Feb. 2004 

Submitted by: Paula Gabbard
e-mail: gabbard@columbia.edu
phone/FAX: (212) 854-6745 / (212) 854-8904
 

2004 GMA Committee members: Kay Teel (Board Liaison), Jacqueline Allen, Roberta Blitz, Margaret Boylan, Barbara Reed, Jeff Ross (Chair), Laura Tatum, Liv Valmestad.

2003 GMA Committee members: Kay Teel (Board Liaison), Jacqueline Allen, Margaret Boylan, Paula Gabbard (chair), Jeff Ross, Suzanna Simor, Liv Valmestad.  Tom McNulty stepped down by his own choice early in the year.

Activities of the year:

March 20-26, 2003 Conference.  We set up a calendar for the coming year, after congratulating ourselves for our success in the previous year (8 papers and 1 web-project, The winning paper by Donny Smith: The Surrogate vs. the Thing, written while he was a student at Drexel University.) Award was presented to Donny Smith at the convocation.

Mid April, 2003: Each committee member reviewed the faculty/library school list, then sent an e-mail announcement to faculty, deans, listservs at library schools throughout the country.  This list of institutions is derived from the ALA web-site of institutions offering North American Library Masters Degree Programs (89 total) (http://www.ala.org/alaorg/oa/lisdir.html#us). 

September, 2003: The committee members again email GMA announcement to all functional email addresses used in April.

November 21, 2003: Submission postmark deadline.

December 10, 2003: Gabbard sends the submitted 8 papers, one web-project, and ballots to committee.

January 9, 2004: Deadline for committee to return ballots to Gabbard.

Late January, 2004: Winner and other applicants are notified, as well as committee members, headquarters, treasurer, etc. (9 qualified papers and 1 web-project.  The winning paper by Ann C. Shincovich (University of Pittsburgh): An Examination of Copyright Issues related to the Creation of a Digital Resource for the Artists’ Books Collection at the Frick Arts Library.

April 15-21, 2004: New York City ARLIS/NA Conference.  Paula Gabbard and Suzanna Simor will step off committee, Jeff Ross will become chair, new committee appointments: Roberta Blitz, perhaps more

A look at this current year’s submissions shows that, they all came from schools we contacted, and three faculty we had specifically contacted were named as professors for which the papers were written or projects were designed.  Most of the faculty listed on the papers/projects are specialists in fields other than visual resources or art librarianship, for example, library management, information retrieval, preservation management, etc.

Gerd Muehsam Award Ballot   2003   (Condensed sample ballot)

Final Grade:________

Final Score:________

Paper Number:______

Title of Paper/Project:_____________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________

Evaluate this paper or project according to the criteria listed below. Score each category with the lowest number as the weakest score and the highest number as the strongest score.  Please add specific and detailed comments for the best several submissions, as they may be incorporated into the awards presentation.  Assign a letter grade (A to F with pluses and minuses) to each paper.  If no paper or project merits a grade higher than B+ from anyone, then we will communicate by email to decide whether we wish to grant any award.  If there is too wide a disparity between our scores, I will want to communicate with you as well.  If there is a tie in scoring the winner, I will review the two submissions and break the tie, but will keep you informed as to the logic of my decision.

 

1.  Relevance to art librarianship or visual resources curatorship:

0  1  2  3   4   5   6   7   8    9   10

 

2. Research and scholarship:

0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9  10

 

3. Originality:

0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8

 

4. Clarity and organization (including style, readability, design, grammar, punctuation, and spelling):

0   1   2   3   4   5   6

 

5. Terminology and vocabulary:

0  1   2   3   4 

Comments:

 

Total score (please note this on top of front page as well):____________

Reviewer's name:_____________________________________________

Date:____________________